KBO 2026
Standings
The table on the left is what happened. The two columns on the right are what the run differential says should have happened, and the gap between them.
| # | Team | G | W | L | T | PCT | GB | Home | Road | Last 10 | RS | RA | DIFF | PYTH | Luck |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Samsung Lions | 123 | 73 | 47 | 3 | .608 | — | 36–23 | 37–24 | 7–3 | 708 | 547 | +161 | 75–45 | −1.9 |
| 2 | KT Wiz | 120 | 71 | 46 | 3 | .607 | 0.5 | 37–21 | 34–25 | 6–4 | 653 | 558 | +95 | 67–50 | +3.6 |
| 3 | LG Twins | 124 | 68 | 55 | 1 | .553 | 6.5 | 38–27 | 30–28 | 5–5 | 629 | 642 | −13 | 60–63 | +7.7 |
| 4 | KIA Tigers | 122 | 66 | 54 | 2 | .550 | 7 | 36–23 | 30–31 | 6–4 | 662 | 582 | +80 | 68–52 | −1.5 |
| 5 | Doosan Bears | 125 | 62 | 59 | 4 | .512 | 11.5 | 33–25 | 29–34 | 3–7 | 576 | 530 | +46 | 65–56 | −3.2 |
| 6 | NC Dinos | 118 | 56 | 60 | 2 | .483 | 15 | 29–32 | 27–28 | 8–2 | 602 | 616 | −14 | 57–59 | −0.7 |
| 7 | Hanwha Eagles | 122 | 54 | 65 | 3 | .454 | 18.5 | 25–33 | 29–32 | 5–5 | 727 | 694 | +33 | 62–57 | −8.3 |
| 8 | Lotte Giants | 120 | 52 | 66 | 2 | .441 | 20 | 23–35 | 29–31 | 2–8 | 568 | 624 | −56 | 54–64 | −1.6 |
| 9 | SSG Landers | 126 | 53 | 68 | 5 | .438 | 20.5 | 26–31 | 27–37 | 6–4 | 623 | 721 | −98 | 52–69 | +1.3 |
| 10 | Kiwoom Heroes | 128 | 45 | 80 | 3 | .360 | 30.5 | 27–40 | 18–40 | 3–7 | 493 | 727 | −234 | 40–85 | +4.8 |
Pythagorean record uses Pythagenpat, where the exponent moves with the run environment rather than sitting at a fixed 2. A club running four or five wins ahead of it is not necessarily lucky, but it is being paid for sequencing — hits arriving in the same inning — which does not carry into next month.
Two axes
Offence against run prevention
Where each club actually sits. Team wOBA measures what the lineup produces per plate appearance; team FIP measures what the staff allows independent of the defence behind it.
Season series
Head to head
Read across a row for how that club has fared against each opponent. Green favours the row, red the column.
| Samsung | KT | LG | KIA | Doosan | Hanwha | NC | Lotte | SSG | Kiwoom | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samsung | · | 9–4 | 8–6 | 6–9 | 6–5 | 8–3 | 11–4 | 7–6 | 8–6 | 10–4 | 73–47 |
| KT | 4–9 | · | 10–5 | 6–6 | 8–4 | 11–3 | 10–4 | 5–5 | 7–7 | 10–3 | 71–46 |
| LG | 6–8 | 5–10 | · | 7–4 | 10–4 | 6–8 | 7–6 | 8–5 | 9–4 | 10–6 | 68–55 |
| KIA | 9–6 | 6–6 | 4–7 | · | 7–8 | 9–6 | 2–10 | 9–4 | 9–3 | 11–4 | 66–54 |
| Doosan | 5–6 | 4–8 | 4–10 | 8–7 | · | 7–8 | 8–3 | 9–5 | 8–8 | 9–4 | 62–59 |
| NC | 4–11 | 4–10 | 6–7 | 10–2 | 3–8 | 9–3 | · | 9–6 | 3–6 | 8–7 | 56–60 |
| Hanwha | 3–8 | 3–11 | 8–6 | 6–9 | 8–7 | · | 3–9 | 10–3 | 9–5 | 4–7 | 54–65 |
| Lotte | 6–7 | 5–5 | 5–8 | 4–9 | 5–9 | 3–10 | 6–9 | · | 7–7 | 11–2 | 52–66 |
| SSG | 6–8 | 7–7 | 4–9 | 3–9 | 8–8 | 5–9 | 6–3 | 7–7 | · | 7–8 | 53–68 |
| Kiwoom | 4–10 | 3–10 | 6–10 | 4–11 | 4–9 | 7–4 | 7–8 | 2–11 | 8–7 | · | 45–80 |
Games above .500
The pennant race
- 01Samsung Lions+13
73–47–3
— GB
L1 - 02KT Wiz+12.5
71–46–3
0.5 GB
W2 - 03LG Twins+6.5
68–55–1
6.5 GB
L4 - 04KIA Tigers+6
66–54–2
7 GB
L2 - 05Doosan Bears+1.5
62–59–4
11.5 GB
L2 - 06NC Dinos−2
56–60–2
15 GB
W1 - 07Hanwha Eagles−5.5
54–65–3
18.5 GB
W5 - 08Lotte Giants−7
52–66–2
20 GB
W1 - 09SSG Landers−7.5
53–68–5
20.5 GB
W1 - 10Kiwoom Heroes−17.5
45–80–3
30.5 GB
W2
Scoring
Runs per game, both ways
| Team | R/G | RA/G | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | HR | SO | ERA | FIP | WHIP | QS | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samsung Lions | 5.90 | 4.56 | .278 | .368 | .415 | .362 | 112 | 864 | 4.11 | 4.48 | 1.36 | 52 | 36 |
| KT Wiz | 5.58 | 4.77 | .279 | .362 | .398 | .353 | 91 | 919 | 4.34 | 4.28 | 1.41 | 53 | 27 |
| LG Twins | 5.11 | 5.22 | .266 | .353 | .399 | .348 | 112 | 901 | 4.96 | 4.66 | 1.49 | 40 | 45 |
| KIA Tigers | 5.52 | 4.85 | .272 | .348 | .441 | .361 | 155 | 958 | 4.40 | 4.77 | 1.41 | 44 | 21 |
| Doosan Bears | 4.76 | 4.38 | .265 | .338 | .389 | .337 | 96 | 878 | 3.67 | 4.05 | 1.32 | 59 | 28 |
| NC Dinos | 5.19 | 5.31 | .272 | .353 | .402 | .350 | 110 | 860 | 4.66 | 5.02 | 1.46 | 41 | 22 |
| Hanwha Eagles | 6.11 | 5.83 | .278 | .357 | .438 | .365 | 155 | 962 | 5.11 | 4.88 | 1.56 | 35 | 15 |
| Lotte Giants | 4.81 | 5.29 | .268 | .331 | .394 | .334 | 95 | 883 | 4.77 | 4.48 | 1.50 | 52 | 23 |
| SSG Landers | 5.15 | 5.96 | .260 | .337 | .404 | .342 | 130 | 1,018 | 5.32 | 5.20 | 1.54 | 29 | 21 |
| Kiwoom Heroes | 3.94 | 5.82 | .243 | .322 | .353 | .317 | 91 | 1,113 | 5.29 | 4.81 | 1.56 | 32 | 27 |
| League | 5.08 | 5.08 | .268 | .347 | .403 | .347 | 1,147 | 9,356 | 4.66 | 4.66 | — | — | — |
League FIP equals league ERA by construction — the FIP constant this season is 3.6, solved so the two line up. A club's FIP below its ERA means the defence or the sequencing, not the arms, has been the problem.